Sonntag, 25. Januar 2009

0901-30 / Von Israeli geplanter Völkermord

.
Aufgrund der Länge des Artikels kann ich ihn leider nicht übersetzen, verwendet bitte den Übersetzer von Google oder Bable-fish.

Der Bericht ist jedoch derart schockierend, daß er unbedingt zur Verfügung gestellt werden muß. Es handelt sich um eine neuartige Bombe, entwickelt in den USA und eingesetzt von Israel gegen die zivile Bevölkerung. Die neue Waffe ist weitaus gefährlicher als DU-Munition - DU war gestern, DIME ist die "ideale" Massenvernichtungswaffe - eingesetzt im Krieg im Gaza-Streifen.





Was könnte denn das sein ?


Ein Stück verdorbenes Fleisch ?






















Oder Beine eines palästinensischen Kindes ?


Aber wer liefert die Waffen dafür ? Die Regierung steckt dahinter ? Die Regierung ? WELCHE Regierung ? WER ist denn die Regierung der USA ? Ohhh bama vielleicht ? IRRTUM !!! Nachstehendes Bild zeigt den eigentlichen Regierungschef der USA, den Chef über dem US-Präsidenten:

Israel Chose War Over Peace


Olmert Reminds The World–


“We, The Jewish People, Control America”

Regierungschef Ehud Olmert

Amidst all the bombs raining down upon the civilian population of the world’s largest outdoor concentration camp known as Gaza, another bomb–1000 times as devastating as those detonated over Japan in 1945–was dropped on the American people but which did not make much discussion in the mainstream news, despite the shock waves it caused in political circles worldwide.

At the height of Israel’s bombing campaign against the Palestinian civilians of Gaza that (as of this moment) has resulted in almost 1,500 deaths of mostly women and children, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert convened a press conference in the southern Israeli town of Ashkelon to “explain” things to the world. The subject matter was the most recent vote taking place in the United Nations on Security Council Resolution 1860 mandating an immediate cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hamas, the brainchild of US Sec. Of State Condoleeza Rice who drafted it after close consultation with other Arab diplomats from the region. Due to the heavy civilian deaths being suffered by the Palestinians, again, over 1,000, compared to little over a dozen suffered by the Jewish state, such a resolution was for all intents and purposes the most humane, moral and fair thing to do that in effect called upon Israel to stop hacking innocent civilians to pieces.

Israel for her part would have nothing of it. Drunk on the bloodshed and suffering she was causing to innocent civilians, she was not going to step away from the buffet table until she had reached her limit. A mere moments before the vote was to take place, the US Sec. of State received a call from her boss, George W Bush and was told to ditch the deal and abstain from voting on the very resolution she herself had penned.

As outrageous as this was, amidst all the human suffering taking place as Israel and her “most moral army in the world” rained down outlawed phosphorous bombs on innocent civilians, schools, mosques, churches and food stores, what was to follow was even worse. Prime Minister Olmert, in behavior similar to that of some wise guy/mob boss who has just beat the rap as a result of yanking the chain of some judge or prosecutor on his payroll, stated in plain language at the convened press conference in Ashkelon that it was he, acting on behalf of Israel, who “made the call” to Bush and brought about the US abstention of vote at the UN. In his own words, upon learning of the “unacceptable” language contained in the resolution, (no doubt obtained by spies working within the State Dept who got their grubby little hands on a pilfered copy) he dropped a dime and put in a call to Bush only to learn that the President was busy giving a speech. Olmert‘s response–in demeanor all-too-typical for Zionists, was “I don’t care; I have to talk to him.” According to Olmert, Bush was called off the podium, given the phone and told in no uncertain language that “the US cannot possibly vote in favor of this resolution”. Olmert than stated with barely-concealed glee that Bush “Gave an order to the secretary of state, and she did not vote in favor of it — a resolution she cooked up, phrased, organized and maneuvered for. She was left pretty shamed, and abstained on a resolution she arranged…”

And the rest “is history,” as the old saying goes.

For its part, when asked about the exchange and subsequent abstention on the vote, the US denied Olmert’s claims. The US State Department characterized Olmert’s version of the events as “inaccurate, totally and completely untrue” while Rice herself called it “Fiction”. When asked to comment on the US’s response, Olmert’s version remain unchanged, in effect– “That’s my story and I’m sticking to it”.

Reaction on the part of organized Jewish groups to the story was mixed. The ADL, adjunct to Israel’s spy agency Mossad, rather than denying the obvious–that this recent event is a reaffirmation of what others have maintained for some time concerning Israel’s ability to yank the foreign policy apparatus of the United States around like a poodle on a leash (something which the ADL loudly denies as it did over the release of Walt and Mearsheimer’s book “The Israel Lobby” with dramatic wailing and gnashing of teeth) shrugged it off. Notorious windbag Abe Foxman, head of the ADL was quoted saying “I have no problem with what Olmert did, but I think the mistake was to talk about it in public” adding “This is what friendships are about. He was not interfering in political issues. You have a relationship, and if you don’t like what is being done, then you go to the boss and tell him.”

Douglas Bloomfield, a former chief lobbyist for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee all but gloated over the effect such a story would have in demonstrating to the world raw Jewish power over the United States saying “This reinforces the perception that the Israeli prime minister and Israeli leaders have easy access to the leaders of the U.S.. It is a fact that the Israeli prime minister can get the president on the phone. Not every prime minister in the world can do that. It is no secret that Israel tried to influence the U.S. regarding U.N. votes. It reinforces what the rivals of Israel say about the enormous clout Israel has in Washington, and I see nothing wrong with that.”

While Foxman and Bloomfield differ on some of the finer points of this event, where they agree however is that, like all criminal organizations who cannot exist in the light of day, “It is a mistake to talk about it.”

Some might make the claim that Israel decided to capitalize on the event by embellishing a few of the details in her favor. Such speculation is neither out of the question nor out of place, given Israel’s well-established history of lying to fit with her agenda, including but not limited to “Holocaustianity” and its seemingly never-ending expansion of the envelope to include grander and grander details of distinctly “Jewish” suffering.

Whether events actually took place in exactly the manner as Olmert described however is irrelevant at this point. The “facts on the ground” are that the US DID abstain from the vote at a time when worldwide outrage over Israel’s deliberate targeting of civilians in Gaza was boiling over and when the US had absolutely NOTHING to gain diplomatically by supporting the carnage. At a time when America is isolated, despised and alone as a result of its “special relationship” with the Jewish state, remaining silent as women and children are hacked to pieces of flesh and bone by Israel certainly does not make things better.

Those hoping in the “change” promised by the new president while on the campaign trail should think twice before investing themselves in such business. Remember the words of Barack Hussein Obama to AIPAC in June 2008 when he had the following to say–

“Our alliance is based on shared interests and shared values. Those who threaten Israel threaten us. And I will bring to the White House an unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security. That starts with ensuring Israel’s qualitative military advantage. I will ensure that Israel can defend itself from any threat — from Gaza to Tehran. As president, I will implement a Memorandum of Understanding that provides $30 billion in assistance to Israel over the next decade — investments to Israel’s security that will not be tied to any other nation. We must approve the foreign aid request for 2009. We should export military equipment to our ally Israel under the same guidelines as NATO. And I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself in the United Nations and around the world.”

In other words, the only difference between former president George W. Bush and the current president Barack Hussein Obama with regards to American foreign policy in the Middle East is that one is named George W. Bush and the other is named Barack Hussein Obama.

It is a law in organized crime circles that “silence is golden” if the syndicate is to survive. When once speaking about AIPAC and the power of organized Jewry in affecting US policy in the Middle East, Steve Rosen (former AIPAC caporegime currently under indictment for espionage against the United States) said Israel and her machinations are like a “night flower” that “thrives in the dark and withers in the light of day”.

What is more important though, and the more telling of it all is the contempt which the Jewish state holds for America as demonstrated by her willingness to gloat over sticking a knife in the back of her “friend”. Although lost on Americans who stay glued to their tv sets keeping up on the latest earth-shaking events on American Idol or Desperate Housewives, what this latest event shows is that in the world of organized crime there is no such thing as loyalty. It is a dog-eat-dog world, and Israel’s recent actions have demonstrated that truly she is not “man’s best friend” but rather, as former Defense Minster Moshe Dayan said “A mad dog, too dangerous to bother”.

(c) 2009 Mark Glenn

Correspondent, American Free Press Newspaper



Lass sie verhungern, erschieße sie

und dann füge ihnen Krebs zu


Eine Untersuchung über den Gebrauch von DIME-Waffen im Gaza-Streifen durch die Israeli

DIME-Bomben, Bomben die bei 100% der getroffenen Bevölkerung unheilbaren Krebs auslösen. Die Verwendung der DIME-Bomben durch israelisches Militär ist gezielte Ausrottung der Bevölkerung - so zog sich das israelische Militär zurück und wartet nun, daß die Bevölkerung stirbt.


Starve Them; Shoot Them; then Give Them Cancer
An Inquiry into Israel’s use of DIME weaponry in of the Gaza Strip

James Brooks, Vermonters for a Just Peace

dime4-10248996_114441a.jpg

23 January 2009
At the end of 2006, James Brooks from Vermonters for a Just Peace published a three part expose into Israel’s suspected use of a previously unseen weapon, DIME Bombs, on the civilian population of the Gaza Strip. Suspicions have arisen once more as Doctors continue to report the 'strange and incurable wounds’ they are encountering following the Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip.

Parts I, II and III of his well-researched and referenced work below:

US and Israel targeting DNA in Gaza? The DIME Bomb: Yet another genotoxic weapon

[Haben es die USA und Israel auf die Erbmasse in Gaza abgesehen ? Die DIME-Bombe: eine neue das Erbgut zerstörende Waffe]

James Brooks, Media Monitors Network, December 4, 2006

"This warfare of the future is reminiscent of what Israel has been doing for years, but with one-ton bombs, 155-mm artillery shells, and tank-fired antipersonnel flechette bombs. Are FLM weapons like DIME an improvement? Or will they actually increase civilian casualties and suffering, and mimic depleted uranium weapons by inducing disease and genetic damage in their victims?"

:: Part 1 of 3 ::

JPG - 16.1 kb
A Palestinian woman with severe facial injuries from a Dime bomb
Picture: The Independent

It’s been almost five months since the first report that Israeli drone aircraft have been dropping a "mystery weapon" on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Since then, news media around the world have run stories depicting the strange and "horrific" wounds inflicted by the new bomb. The international press has spoken with Palestinian doctors and medics who say Israel’s new device is a kind of chemical weapon that has significantly increased the fatality rate among the victims of Israeli attacks. [1][2]

In mid-October, Italian investigators reported forensic evidence that suggests the new weapon may also represent the near future of US "counterinsurgency warfare". Combined with photographs of the victims and testimony from attending doctors, this evidence points to the use of Dense Inert Metal Explosives (DIME). [3]

DIME is an LCD ("low collateral damage") weapon developed at the US Air Force Research Laboratory. Publicly, it is slated for initial deployment in 2008. DIME bombs produce an unusually powerful blast within a relatively small area, spraying a superheated "micro-shrapnel" of powdered Heavy Metal Tungsten Alloy (HMTA). Scientific studies have found that HMTA is chemically toxic, damages the immune system, rapidly causes cancer, and attacks DNA (genotoxic).[4-11]

It is unfortunate that the US media have virtually blacked out the story of Israel’s new weapon, not least because our own military may soon be using it in Iraq and Afghanistan. The story might also have told us something about the grossly disproportionate brutality of Israel’s war on the Palestinian people—reason enough for the media to suppress it. [12]

Thanks to the intrepid Italians, the story could even have introduced Americans to their government’s DIME weapons program. This three-part article will ask whether Israel is 'testing’ US DIME bombs in the Gaza Strip, and explore the workings, dangers, and projected use of DIME weapons and their roots in depleted uranium (DU) research. These parallels will lead us to consider DIME in its historical context, as the latest innovation in the US military’s long-running development of genotoxic weapons.

"They cannot return to life again"

The first reports about 'Israel’s new weapon’ came from Dr Joma Al-Saqqa, chief of the emergency unit at Gaza’s largest hospital, Al-Shifa. Dr. Al-Saqqa said that Israel was using "a new 'chemical’ weapon" and its siege was "a live exercise on a new ammunition that, so far, has resulted in killing 50 Palestinians and injuring 200." He observed that, "despite the damage in internal soft tissue in the bodies of injured people, the fragments were not detected by X-ray. In other words, they had disappeared or dissolved inside the body."[13]

"There were usually entry and exit wounds," Dr. Al-Saqqa reported. "When the wounds were explored no foreign material was found. There was tissue death, the extent of which was diff icult to determine….A higher deep infection rate resulted with subsequent amputation. In spite of amputation there was a higher mortality." The effects of the weapon seemed "radioactive". [14][15]

According to Palestine News Network, Dr. Al-Saqqa "confirmed that there were dozens of wounded legs and arms. Many of them had been burned from the inside, and distorted to the point that they cannot return to life again."[16]

"When the shrapnel hit[s] the body, it causes very strong burns that destroy the tissues around the bones…it burns and destroys internal organs, like the liver, kidneys, and the spleen and other organs and makes saving the wounded almost impossible. As a surgeon, I have seen thousands of wounds during the Intifada, but nothing was like this weapon."[17]

However, Dr. Al-Saqqa could not analyze the chemistry of the bizarre wounds. On the first day of the siege, June 27, Israel had conveniently destroyed Gaza’s only criminal laboratory. [18]

Despite his pleas to the "international community" to investigate and lend assistance in treating the victims, "no one has lifted a finger", the doctor was quoted in mid-July. "What we found were journalists who came to take pictures, but as for the medical community, nothing." [19]

On August 3, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) reported that Commissioner-General Karen AbuZayd had visited Dr. Al-Saqqa’s hospital, "where the staff is struggling to deal with wounds resulting in an unusually high number of amputations." Commissioner AbuZayd commented that "what we saw in Al-Shifa...was rather horrific." [20]

According to Merlin (Medical Emergency Relief International), "75 per cent of war-wounded patients admitted at one hospital needed amputations" following an Israeli attack on Gaza City. [21]

The World Health Organization was reportedly considering an investigation into the injuries. Physicians for Human Rights - Israel "agreed to take away fragments of tissue from the bodies of Palestinians killed during the recent military operations in Gaza for possible analysis in Israel but urged the medics to seek an international investigation." [22]

Tungsten in Tissue Samples: A DIME Weapon?

On October 19, Italy’s Rai24news televised an investigative report that supplied crucial new information. The Italian investigators had tissue samples from the victims in Gaza analyzed by Dr. Carmela Vaccaio at University Parma. Dr. Vaccaio reportedly found "a very high concentration of carbon and the presence of unusual materials, such as copper, aluminum and tungsten." The doctor concluded that her "findings could be in line with the hypothesis that the weapon in question is DIME."

Rai24news reporters also talked to Maj. Gen. Yitzhak Ben-Israel, former chief of the IDF’s weapons development program. General Ben-Israel appeared to be familiar with DIME weapons. He explained that, "one of the ideas is to allow those targeted to be hit without causing damage to bystanders or other persons." [23]

The US Air Force refers to this emerging realm of weaponry as FLM (Focused Lethality Munitions). FLM is expected to provide the 'weapons of choice’ for targeting "terrorists hiding among civilians", as a cheerleading Wall Street Journal article put it. [24]

With "focused lethality [and] higher energy materials...nano particles, intelligent fuzing, [and] mass focus lethality", the Air Force "will be able to strike effectively, wherever and whenever necessary, with minimal collateral damage." Ominously, the military thinks these weapons will allow it to target sites "previously off limits to the warfighter." [25][26]

This warfare of the future is reminiscent of what Israel has been doing for years, but with one-ton bombs, 155-mm artillery shells, and tank-fired antipersonnel flechette bombs. Are FLM weapons like DIME an improvement? Or will they actually increase civilian casualties and suffering, and mimic depleted uranium weapons by inducing disease and genetic damage in their victims? These disturbing questions will be explored in the next installment of this article.

:: Part 2 of 3 ::

"Horrific" wounds in Gaza may be warfare of the future

In early July, shortly after the beginning of Israel’s bloody military siege of the Gaza Strip, reports began to appear that Israeli forces were using a new weapon that inflicted strange and untreatable wounds, and significantly increased the death tolls of Israel’s attacks. [27][28]

Italian investigators have reported evidence that the unidentified Israeli weapon is probably Dense Inert Metal Explosives, or DIME, a so-called LCD ("low collateral damage") weapon developed by the United States Air Force. [29]

DIME bombs blast a superheated "micro-shrapnel" of powdered heavy metal tungsten alloy (HMTA). Studies indicate that HMTA embedded in the body disrupts biochemistry and rapidly causes cancer. Like depleted uranium (DU), HMTA is genotoxic—it is capable of inflicting genetic mutations. [30-36]

Publicly slated for deployment in 2008, DIME bombs are small but unusually powerful. Their carbon fiber casings make "more of the blast energy…available as blast as opposed to being absorbed in [a] steel case". The carbon reportedly breaks into "thousands of harmless fibers" to prevent unintended casualties from casing shrapnel. [37]

The 'footprint’ of the DIME blast is much smaller than a conventional bomb’s, because gravity and air resistance quickly drag the dense, finely powdered "micro-shrapnel" to the ground. The blast radius is reportedly as small as 25 feet. [38][39]

DIME is part of the Air Force’s Focused Lethality Munitions (FLM) program, which is expected to "allow" the targeting of "terrorists" wherever they are, even in places "previously off limits to the warfighter." [40]

The ideal of FLM is to reliably kill every human within the blast zone—one way or another. It is 'total war’ on a 50-foot circle, within which deaths are not admitted as collateral, but purchased as insurance.

Israel’s new weapon "slices" off its victims’ legs, leaving "signs of heat and burns near the point of the amputation". It’s "as if a saw was used to cut through the bone", according to Dr. Habas al-Wahid, head of the ER at Gaza’s Shuhada al-Aqsa hospital. [41]

Viewing photographs of the living and dead Palestinian victims of this device, many of whom are children, we notice patches of darkened but unburned skin, possibly where metal powder was driven into and/or through the skin by blast force. A child’s torso is peppered with holes, some of which, judging from doctors’ reports, probably tunnel through to exit wounds in the back. The skin and muscle of one victim is ripped into a blood-encrusted pulp, as if blasted at close range with tiny birdshot. Some of the corpses are unrecognizable. Most of the recent photos of "strange" wounds from Gaza appear to be consistent with what is known about DIME weapons. [42]

The area of a DIME blast should be treated with caution until it has been decontaminated (assuming this is possible). Depending on the local HMTA concentration, soil in the blast area may remain barren for an indefinite period of time, or it may grow plants internally contaminated with HMTA. [43][44]

The "who knew?" charade

In the scientific literature on tungsten and its alloys, the toxicity of HMTA stands apart. This formula (roughly 9 parts tungsten and one part nickel and cobalt or iron) damages DNA even when powders of the metals are simply mixed together. [30][31][35]

Implanting four tiny bits of weapons-grade HMTA in lab mice induced terminal cancer in 100 percent of the subjects. A powdered HMTA recipe was tumor-generating and capable of "genotoxic effects". At least one experiment found parallels in the way DU and HMTA attack DNA. The results of another suggested that HMTA may pass its genetic damage down to the next generation. [34][31][35][36]

HMTA may be much more carcinogenic than DU when it is embedded in the body—as intended. "Tumors developed rapidly" in rats implanted with pellets of HMTA, but researchers "did not observe tumor formation in the DU-implanted rats."

Multiple syndromes of heavy metal poisoning have also been attributed to this alloy, including polycythemia, which can be induced by cobalt overdose. Because HMTA contains far too little cobalt to cause the disease by itself, researchers suspected a synergistic effect among or between the metals. [34]

In a 2005 article reviewing the "status of health concerns" about depleted uranium and "surrogate metals" such as HMTA, three scientists at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) wrote that "medical and political controversies surrounding the use of DU" had spurred "a search for substitute metals in armor-penetrating munitions." [45]

"[N]ew alloys of tungsten/nickel/cobalt and tungsten/nickel/iron…rival DU in armor-penetrating performance", and are "among the leading candidates to replace DU in selected munitions". Some of this ordnance "has already been deployed, although on a relatively small scale."

The article then reviews the science detailing the alarming health risks of HMTA, much of it conducted by the authors, whom we thank for their work. It then attempts to explain how the military’s favorite "surrogate metal" turned out to be almost as genotoxic as DU, and probably more carcinogenic: "In many ways the development of substitutes for DU in munitions has followed a pattern similar to that for DU deployment, in that incomplete toxicological information was available prior to their release…it was assumed that many years of industrial use of tungsten and alloys such as tungsten carbide…meant they could be used as safely in armaments."

We infer that it was reasonable for the military to deploy DU weapons, because the toxicological information was "incomplete". It’s a strange scientific rigor that requires us to know exactly how a known poison works before we stop giving it to people.

The cold fact is that there never was a scientifically valid reason to "assume" that depleted uranium could be used "safely in armaments". Quite the opposite; as we shall see in part three, the Army realized more than 60 years ago that finely powdered uranium products could make extremely potent antipersonnel weapons. [46]

We currently have "incomplete toxicological information" about HMTA, but for more than fifteen years we have had clear warnings about the health risks of combining these metals. US weapons scientists should have known as early as 1992 that mixing cobalt with tungsten could greatly increase the resulting alloy’s cancer potential. [47][48]

It is hardly news that nickel is carcinogenic and genotoxic, and specialists have long noted that heavy metal alloys tend to unpredictably amplify the toxicities of their component metals. With this kind of "incomplete" information at hand, could military scientists have reasonably "assumed" that nickel would be a "safe" addition to HMTA?

Concerns have been voiced about tungsten sport ammunition for several years. Tungsten alloy bullets, some also containing nickel and cobalt (for superior hardness), were found to pose potential environmental hazards in several studies. A probable link between industrial tungsten and leukemia has been identified. Compared to these findings, however, the toxicity of HMTA may be of a different order. [43][44]

The "who knew?" apologia offered by the AFRRI researchers asks us to assume that the scientists who developed DIME weapons proceeded in sheer ignorance of the existing science. They were so incompetent that they merely "assumed" that they could use any tungsten alloy.

Does this implausibility jibe with the rest of the picture? A multi-billion dollar military weapons program is stung by the "controversies" surrounding its toxic DU-uranium weapons, and is under pressure to produce an expedient alternative. Would this program’s scientists have been allowed to be so cavalier about consulting the literature? Would the replacement metal be chosen on blind faith, without bothering to conduct even simple studies of its potential health impacts?

Logically, we must conclude that the military developed HMTA in the knowledge that it could have significant carcinogenic and genotoxic effects. Did they "assume" that saying "tungsten is safer than DU" would take care of the matter?

Perhaps relatively non-toxic tungsten carbide, famed for its hardness and cutting ability, would not have sufficed for the purposes of the DIME bomb. Focused Lethality Munitions like DIME must kill all of their victims. Slicing off their arms and legs is not enough.

The last installment of this article will trace the roots of HMTA in depleted uranium and decades of US warfare with poisonous, DNA-damaging powders. Then we will return to Gaza to consider the damage done, and the damage to come, if the warmakers have their way.

:: Part 3 of 3 ::

The human genome: target or innocent bystander?

Since early July, Israeli forces have been using a new weapon in the Gaza Strip that inflicts strange and deadly wounds. Doctors and medics say the unidentified device has significantly increased fatalities from Israel’s attacks. [49][50]

In the first two parts of this article we reviewed evidence that Israel’s new weapon may be Dense Inert Metal Explosives (DIME), a "low collateral damage" weapon developed by the US Air Force. The DIME bomb’s "micro-shrapnel" is reportedly made of HMTA, a tungsten alloy that disrupts body biochemistry, damages the immune system, rapidly causes cancer, and attacks DNA (genotoxic). [51-56]

The Road to DIME

DIME weapons are "spin-offs" from the military’s "bunker buster" research. Initially, "bunker busters" were made with depleted uranium (DU), which had already been used in armor-piercing bombs, bullets, and artillery shells. [57] The former director of the US Army’s Depleted Uranium project, Dr. Douglas Rokke, warns us that DU is an "illegal…radioactive toxic material", the use of which "is absolutely unacceptable, and a crime against humanity." [58]

During Gulf War I, US forces deployed more than 300 tons of DU in Iraq. A few years later, more was dropped during Operation Desert Fox. Iraqi doctors reported alarming rises in the incidence of cancer, leukemia, and birth defects, in clusters closely correlated with US bombsites. Scientists found strong links between DU and Gulf War Syndrome, which is slowly killing thousands of veterans. [59-61]

Despite the science, the vets, and the tragedies in Iraq, the US has stubbornly refused to end its use of DU. US-UK forces may have expended more than 2000 additional tons of DU in Iraq since March 2003. Nowadays, however, commanders are supposed to warn GIs to avoid contact with the results of their work. [62]

After the 2001-2002 bombing of Afghanistan, the Uranium Medical Research Centre (UMRC) found that the urine of Afghanis living near US bombing sites contained 4 to 20 times the normal level of non-depleted uranium (NDU).

These unexpected results could not "be explained by…any known geological or other features in the area." UMRC researchers were "shocked" that, "without exception, at every bombsite investigated, people are ill…[with] symptoms consistent with internal contamination by uranium." [63]

Their field results indicated that our weapons scientists had "progressed" beyond DU to NDU, a processed form of pure uranium that is even more toxic than the depleted form. The "slightly enriched" uranium reported from recent Israeli bombsites in Lebanon may possibly be NDU from modified GBU 28 'bunker busters’ supplied by the United States. [64][65]

Dual-Purpose Munitions

Considering the scope of their destructive power, DU and NDU may be said to function as Dual-Purpose Munitions, like cluster bomblets that kill both tanks and people. As their exotic metallurgy "burns" through concrete and steel, DU and NDU bombs are converted to micron-sized particles that sicken and kill and murder the next generation in the womb. [66][67]

Agent Orange, an herbicide heavily used during the war on Vietnam, also performed two functions. It obliterated the 'jungle cover hiding the Viet Cong’ while it 'weakened the enemy’ with burns, illness, and death, and corrupted the DNA of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese. The third generation of its disfigured and suffering victims is now being born. [68][69]

This madness seems to have begun during World War II, within the Manhattan Project that built the first atomic bomb. In a 1943 memo to Brigadier General L. R. Groves, three researchers proposed steps to develop: "a gas warfare instrument" [of radioactive material, such as uranium] "ground into particles of microscopic size to form dust and smoke….in this form it would be inhaled by personnel. The amount necessary to cause death to a person inhaling the material is extremely small. It has been estimated that one millionth of a gram accumulating in a person’s body would be fatal. There are no known methods of treatment for such a casualty." [70]

The good doctors were concerned the Germans might be preparing such a weapon. They urged the Army to be ready to respond, or act, in kind. General Groves promptly followed their recommendations.

The toxic HMTA "micro-shrapnel" spewed by DIME weapons appears to be the latest development in a long string of carcinogenic and genotoxic weapons developed and deployed by the US military.

Return to Gaza: The mythology of murder

Israel has denied using DIME weapons. Nonetheless, Israel’s military has used the occupied Palestinian territories as a weapons development zone for decades, testing bright ideas like depleted uranium and poison gases. It would not surprise us to find that it is now testing a weapon for the US Air Force on Palestinians in Gaza. [71]

Unfortunately, the DIME hypothesis is the most plausible explanation for the grotesque effects of Israel’s new weapon. We can only pray that we have not witnessed the first experiment in the effects of embedded HMTA in human subjects.

Still, DIME may not explain all of the evidence. For example, one of the metals found in victims’ wounds was copper. DIME bombs are not known to contain significant copper, but another US marvel, the Sensor Fuzed Weapon (SFW), sprays slugs of molten copper at its targets. Is Israel also testing the SFW? [72][73]

If DIME weapons are designed to reduce civilian casualties, why has Israel’s 'mystery weapon’ increased the civilian death toll? Perhaps this question should be addressed to the advocates of Focused Lethality Munitions, and to the remote-control operators of Israel’s drone aircraft and their commanders and politicians.

Although much remains unclear about Israel’s new weapon, a few devastating facts are indisputable:

- The weapon causes enormous and indiscriminate pain and suffering.
- It operates as both a chemical weapon and an anti-personnel explosive. At the very least, it is likely to induce heavy metal poisoning in its surviving victims.
- The weapon has significantly increased civilian mortality rates, in part because it inflicts virtually untreatable wounds.
- Despite this public parade of horrors, Israeli forces have continued to use this weapon against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip for nearly five months.

"Whenever and wherever necessary"

If the DIME hypothesis is confirmed, authorities will probably explain that it is a new class of weapon not regulated by international law. The truth is that existing conventions and treaties have already prohibited some of the most egregious effects of the new weapon.

To cite one example, the bomb may be in direct violation of Protocol I of the ’Geneva Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons’, which "prohibits the use of any weapon the primary effect of which is to injure by fragments which in the human body escape detection by X-rays." [74]

We will likely be told that DIME weapons provide a more "humane" way to fight "terrorism" by "reducing collateral damage" and "helping US troops win hearts and minds". At the same time, we’ll be assured that the new weapon "packs quite a punch" and will "give our troops more options" to "take the battle to the enemy", even if he is "hiding among civilians".

Whether Israel’s new weapon is the Air Force’s DIME bomb or another similarly dreadful invention, the horrors unfolding in Gaza make it clear that "Focused Lethality" is a blood-drenched lie. It promises only a deadlier form of indiscriminate warfare.

US plans to explode payloads of cancer-causing genotoxic heavy metal powder "wherever and whenever necessary" may portend an escalation of a campaign currently limited to the vicinity of "hard targets" we attack with DU and NDU. Whatever we make of the intent behind these weapons, the habitual result is chemical-genetic warfare. It cannot be allowed to continue.

JPG - 35.5 kb
Suspected DIME injury from 2006, Gaza
Pictures: Vermonters For Just Peace http://www.vtjp.org/images/320gaza_new_weapon_legs.jpg

Notes:

[1]. Palestinian injuries suggest Israel is using chemical weapons in Gaza Ma’an News, 7/10/2006 http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php? opr=ShowDetails&ID=13044

[2]. Israel used chemical weapons in Lebanon and Gaza By Jean Shaoul, Centre for Research on Globalization/wsws.org, 10/24/2006 http://wsws.org/articles/2006/oct2006/ isra-o24.shtml

[3]. Italian TV: Israel used new weapon prototype in Gaza Strip Ha’aretz, 10/19/2006 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=772894

[4]. Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME) GlobalSecurity.org, 10/18/2006 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ systems/munitions/dime.htm

[5]. Abstract: Potential late health effects of depleted uranium and tungsten used in armor-piercing munitions: comparison of neoplastic transformation and genotoxicity with the known carcinogen nickel Miller, AC, et al, PubMed, 11/26/2006 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/ query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed& list_uids=11873492&dopt=Abstract

[6]. Neoplastic transformation of human osteoblast cells to the tumorigenic phenotype by heavy metal–tungsten alloy particles: induction of genotoxic effects Miller, AC, et al Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 1, 115-125, January 2001, Oxford University Press http://carcin.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/ full/22/1/115

[7]. Abstract: Carcinogenic Potential of Depleted Uranium and Tungsten Alloys Alexandra C Miller, Ph. D., Department Of Defense, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) http://www.deploymentlink.osd.mil/ du_library/reports/projects/dod122.htm

[8]. Depleted uranium-catalyzed oxidative DNA damage: absence of significant alpha particle decay Miller, AC, et al, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, Issue 91, 2002 pp. 246– 252 http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/outreach/ pdf/tungsten_cancer.pdf

[9]. Embedded Weapons-Grade Tungsten Alloy Shrapnel Rapidly Induces Metastatic High-Grade Rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 Rats Kalinich et al, Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 113, Number 6, June 2005 http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/ 7791/7791.html

[10]. Abstract: Effect of the militarily-relevant heavy metals, depleted uranium and heavy metal tungsten-alloy on gene expression in human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2) By Miller, AC, et al, SpringerLink/Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 1/1/2004 http://www.springerlink.com/content/u8830 115617471jl/

[11]. Preconceptional paternal exposure to radiation or heavy metals like cadmium can induce cancer in unexposed offspring By Alexandra C. Miller, Rafael Rivas, Robert J. Merlot and Paul, Carcinogenesis 5: Environmental and Endogenous Carcinogens/Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 47, 2006 http://www.aacrmeetingabstracts.org/cgi/ content/abstract/2006/1/448-b

[12]. If Americans Knew http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

[13]. Israel ’is using chemical ammunition’ in Gaza By Duraid Al Baik, Centre for Research on Globalization/Gulf News, 6/13/2006 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? context=viewArticle&code= AL%2020060713&articleId=2730

[14]. Are New Weapons Being Used In Gaza and Lebanon By David Halpin MB BS FRCS, Electronic Intifada, 8/14/2006 http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article5528. shtml

[15]. Ministry of Health report on toxic Israeli weapons confirmed by Gaza City medical sources Palestine News Network, 7/13/2006 http://www.pnn.ps/english/archive2006/ jul/week2/130706/report5.htm

[16]. ibid.

[17]. Doctors Report Unusual Weapon Used in Gaza Pacifica/Free Speech Radio News 7/11/2006 http://www.pacifica.org/programs/fsrn/ fsrn_060711.html

[18]. Israel ’is using chemical ammunition’ in Gaza Centre for Research on Globalization/Gulf News, 6/13/2006 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? context=viewArticle&code= AL%2020060713&articleId=2730

[19]. Ministry of Health report on toxic Israeli weapons confirmed by Gaza City medical sources Palestine News Network, 7/13/2006 http://www.pnn.ps/english/archive2006/ jul/week2/130706/report5.htm

[20]. UNRWA Commissioner-General Karen AbuZayd: "Please don’t forget what’s going on in Gaza" ReliefWeb/UNRWA, 8/3/2006 http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/ db900SID/EVOD-6SBJDR? OpenDocument&rc=3&emid=ACOS-635PFR

[21]. Hospitals in Gaza overwhelmed and running out of supplies Electronic Intifada/Merlin, 8/8/2006 http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article5455. shtml

[22]. Gaza doctors encounter ’unexplained injuries’ Donald Macintyre, The Independent 9/4/2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/ middle_east/article1359830.ece

[23]. Italian TV: Israel used new weapon prototype in Gaza Strip Ha’aretz, 10/12/2006 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=772894

[24]. Air Force seeks a bomb with less bang By Greg Jaffe, The Wall Street Journal/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 4/11/2006 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06096/679996-84.stm

[25]. Munition Technology Drivers By Col. Thomas "Mas" Masiell, Air Force Research Laboratory, 12/1/2006 http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2001munitions/masiello.pdf

[26]. USAF Unfunded Priority List (UPL) SAF/FMB POC, FY 2007, February 2006, Page 54 http://wwwd.house.gov/hasc_democrats/ Issues%20109th/unfunded/AF%20UFR% 20FY07.pdf

[27]. Israel accused of using ’Dime’ bombs AlJazeera, 10/13/2006 http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ B79DF070-B20C-47A7-A204- 08297E5FC1B2.htm

[28]. Israel used chemical weapons in Lebanon and Gaza By Jean Shaoul, Centre for Research on Globalization/wsws.org, 10/24/2006 http://wsws.org/articles/2006/oct2006/isra-o24.shtml

[29]. Italian TV: Israel used new weapon prototype in Gaza Strip Ha’aretz, 10/19/2006 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=772894

[30]. Abstract: Potential late health effects of depleted uranium and tungsten used in armor-piercing munitions: comparison of neoplastic transformation and genotoxicity with the known carcinogen nickel Miller, AC, et al, PubMed, 11/26/2006 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query. fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids =11873492&dopt=Abstract

[31]. Neoplastic transformation of human osteoblast cells to the tumorigenic phenotype by heavy metal–tungsten alloy particles: induction of genotoxic effects Miller, AC, et al Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 1, 115-125, January 2001, Oxford University Press http://carcin.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/ full/22/1/115

[32]. Abstract: Carcinogenic Potential of Depleted Uranium and Tungsten Alloys Alexandra C Miller, Ph. D., Department Of Defense, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) http://www.deploymentlink.osd.mil/du_ library/reports/projects/dod122.htm

[33]. Depleted uranium-catalyzed oxidative DNA damage: absence of significant alpha particle decay Miller, AC, et al, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, Issue 91, 2002 pp. 246– 252 http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/outreach/ pdf/tungsten_cancer.pdf

[34]. Embedded Weapons-Grade Tungsten Alloy Shrapnel Rapidly Induces Metastatic High-Grade Rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 Rats Kalinich et al, Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 113, Number 6, June 2005 http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/ 7791/7791.html

[35]. Abstract: Effect of the militarily-relevant heavy metals, depleted uranium and heavy metal tungsten-alloy on gene expression in human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2) By Miller, AC, et al, SpringerLink/Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 1/1/2004 http://www.springerlink.com/content/ u8830115617471jl/

[36]. Preconceptional paternal exposure to radiation or heavy metals like cadmium can induce cancer in unexposed offspring By Alexandra C. Miller, Rafael Rivas, Robert J. Merlot and Paul, Carcinogenesis 5: Environmental and Endogenous Carcinogens/Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 47, 2006 http://www.aacrmeetingabstracts.org/cgi/ content/abstract/2006/1/448-b

[37]. Air Force seeks a bomb with less bang By Greg Jaffe, The Wall Street Journal/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 4/11/2006 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06096/679996-84.stm

[38]. Cancer Worries for New U.S. Bombs DefenseTech.org, 5/20/2006 http://www.defensetech.org/archives/ 002434.html

[39]. Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME) GlobalSecurity.org, 10/18/2006 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ systems/munitions/dime.htm

[40]. USAF Unfunded Priority List (UPL) SAF/FMB POC, FY 2007, February 2006, Page 54 http://wwwd.house.gov/hasc_democrats/ Issues%20109th/unfunded/AF%20UFR% 20FY07.pdf

[41]. Italian TV: Israel used new weapon prototype in Gaza Strip Ha’aretz, 10/19/2006 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=772894

[42]. Effects of Israel’s New Weapon Vermonters for a Just Peace in Palestine/Israel http://www.vtjp.org/report/neweapon images.htm

[43]. Possible Health And Environmental Impacts Of Tungsten In Lead Replacement Shot Paul Harrison and Karen Bradley, MRC Institute for Environment and Health 2005 http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/ chemicals/achs/050906/achs0516a.pdf

[44]. Tungsten Effects on Soil Environments Nikolay Strigul, et al, UMass, Annual International Conference on Soil, Sediments and Water, 10/18/2004 http://www.umasssoils.com/abstracts2004/ Tuesday/trainingranges.htm#Tungsten% 20Effects%20on%20Soil%20Environments

[45]. Status of Health Concerns about Military Use of Depleted Uranium and Surrogate Metals in Armor-Penetrating Munitions D.E. McClain, A.C. Miller, and J.F. Kalinich, NATO, 2005 http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/outreach/ pdf/mcclain_NATO_2005.pdf

[46]. Memorandum to: Brigadier General L. R. Groves From: Drs. Conant, Compton, and Urey Midfully.org/War Department, United States Engineer Office, Manhattan District, Oak Ridge Tennessee, 10/30/1943 http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/Groves- Memo-Manhattan30oct43.htm

[47]. Abstract: Comparative study of the acute lung toxicity of pure cobalt powder and cobalt-tungsten carbide mixture in rat Lasfargues G., et al, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1992 http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt =5201679

[48]. Evaluation of the role of reactive oxygen species in the interactive toxicity of carbide-cobalt mixtures on macrophages in culture D. Lison and R. Lauwerys, SpringerLink//Archives of Toxicology, 6/1/1993 http://www.springerlink.com/content/ k2u94u07558q6224/

[49]. Gaza doctors say patients suffering mystery injuries after Israeli attacks By Rory McCarthy, The Guardian, 10/18/2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/ 0,,1924675,00.html

[50]. Israel used chemical weapons in Lebanon and Gaza By Jean Shaoul, Centre for Research on Globalization/wsws.org, 10/24/2006 http://wsws.org/articles/2006/oct2006/ isra-o24.shtml

[51]. Abstract: Potential late health effects of depleted uranium and tungsten used in armor-piercing munitions: comparison of neoplastic transformation and genotoxicity with the known carcinogen nickel Miller, AC, et al, PubMed, 11/26/2006 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query. fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_ uids=11873492&dopt=Abstract

[52]. Neoplastic transformation of human osteoblast cells to the tumorigenic phenotype by heavy metal–tungsten alloy particles: induction of genotoxic effects Miller, AC, et al Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 1, 115-125, January 2001, Oxford University Press http://carcin.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/ full/22/1/115

[53]. Abstract: Carcinogenic Potential of Depleted Uranium and Tungsten Alloys Alexandra C Miller, Ph. D., Department Of Defense, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) http://www.deploymentlink.osd.mil/du_ library/reports/projects/dod122.htm

[54]. Depleted uranium-catalyzed oxidative DNA damage: absence of significant alpha particle decay Miller, AC, et al, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, Issue 91, 2002 pp. 246– 252 http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/outreach/ pdf/tungsten_cancer.pdf

[55]. Embedded Weapons-Grade Tungsten Alloy Shrapnel Rapidly Induces Metastatic High-Grade Rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 Rats Kalinich et al, Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 113, Number 6, June 2005 http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/ 7791/7791.html

[56]. Abstract: Effect of the militarily-relevant heavy metals, depleted uranium and heavy metal tungsten-alloy on gene expression in human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2) By Miller, AC, et al, SpringerLink/Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 1/1/2004 http://www.springerlink.com/content/ u8830115617471jl/

[57]. Preconceptional paternal exposure to radiation or heavy metals like cadmium can induce cancer in unexposed offspring By Alexandra C. Miller, Rafael Rivas, Robert J. Merlot and Paul, Carcinogenesis 5: Environmental and Endogenous Carcinogens/Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 47, 2006 http://www.aacrmeetingabstracts.org/cgi/ content/abstract/2006/1/448-b [58]. Cancer Worries for New U.S. Bombs DefenseTech.org, 5/20/2006 http://www.defensetech.org/archives/ 002434.html

[59]. Depleted Uranium and US-Israeli Bombs By Dr. Doug Rokke, PhD, Media Lens, 7/24/2006 http://members5.boardhost.com/medialens/ msg/1153759483.html

[60]. Dirty Weapons - Casualties From Iraq War Will Mount By Chalmers Johnson, Pacific News Service, 5/3/2003 http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view _article.html?article_id=84a8df02a7c1f37 0c5ca152d5ef14d6b

[61]. Uranium Radiation Levels in Afghanistan Not Attributable to Depleted Uranium Centre for Research on Globalization - Middle East, 6/5/2003 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/ UMR306B.html

[62]. Depleted Uranium Radioactive Contamination In Iraq: An Overview By Prof Souad N. Al-Azzawi, Centre for Research on Globalization - Middle East, 8/31/2006 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? context=viewArticle&code= AL-20060831&articleId=3116

[63]. Use of Depleted Uranium Weapons Lingers as Health Concern By Larry Johnson, Common Dreams, 8/4/2003 http://www.commondreams.org/headlines 03/0804-04.htm

[64]. Further Evidence Of Enriched Uranium In The Air In Lebanon Following The Recent Conflict Stop Uranium Wars/Pandora DU research Project, 11/22/2006 http://www.stopuraniumwars.blogspot.com/

[65]. Mystery of Israel’s secret uranium bomb By Robert Fisk, The Independent, 10/28/2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/ article1935945.ece

[66]. The Real Dirty Bombs: Depleted Uranium By Christopher Bollyn, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, 8/6/2004 http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/ 08/06_bollyn_real-dirty-bombs.htm

[67]. Depleted Uranium Australian Peace Committee, 12/2/2006 http://www.peacecourier.com/depleted_ uranium.htm

[68]. Vietnam Agent Orange Relief & Responsibility Campaign http://www.vn-agentorange.org/

[69]. Agent Orange DNA injury confirmed in Vietnam veterans By Patrick Gower, New Zealand Herald, 7/29/2006 http://subs.nzherald.co.nz/feature/story. cfm?c_id=500855&objectid=10393538

[70]. Memorandum to: Brigadier General L. R. Groves From: Drs. Conant, Compton, and Urey Midfully.org/War Department, United States Engineer Office, Manhattan District, Oak Ridge Tennessee, 10/30/1943 http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/ Groves-Memo-Manhattan30oct43.htm

[71]. The Israeli Poison Gas Attacks James Brooks, Vermonters for a Just Peace in Palestine/Israel http://www.vtjp.org/report/

[72]. CBU-97 Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBU-97

[73]. Textron Systems’ Sensor Fuzed Weapon Production to Include Maritime Capability Textron Systems Corporation, 8/10/2006 http://www.systems.textron.com/mainframe /pressroom/archives/2006/08_10_06.html

[74]. Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons... United Nations: International Law, 10/10/1980 http://www.un.org/millennium/law/xxvi- 18-19.htm


Freitag, 23. Januar 2009

0901-29 / Die USA stänkern weiter !

.






Ungeachtet des neuen Präsidenten in den USA

suchen die Neocons weiterhin Konflikte mit


Russland !





Die Neocons der USA im Dienste des Council on Foreign Relations und des CSIS greifen Russland bislang nicht offen an.
Die Marionettenregierung von Georgien diente als Aushängeschild des von den USA durch Militärberater begleiteten Angriff auf Südossetien, was einem militärischen Angriff auf Russland gleichkam. Es waren eben offiziell keine US-Soldaten, sie begleiteten nur die georgischen Soldaten beim Angriff. Daß dies im Westen nicht bekannt wurde, verdanken die USA einer quasi perfekten Kontrolle der Medien und einer rigorosen Pressezensur in allen mit den USA verbündeten NATO-Staaten (besser ausgedrückt in den Satellitenstaaten der USA - wie z.B. der "BRD"). Wie die "BRD" ein Satellitenstaat ist, so ist auch die Ukraine mit der Präsenz von Viktor Juschtschenko zum Satellitenstaat der USA geworden. Der gesamte "Gaskrieg" geht auf US-Planungen zurück. Zweck der Operation war die Aufwiegelung der Osteuropäischen Staaten gegen Russland - denn sie traf es am härtesten. Viele werden sich noch daran erinnern, daß in Rumänien keine Heizungen mehr liefen. Daß das Gas in Tschechien und der Slovakei zur Neige ging. All das schafft keine Sympathien - und die von den USA gesteuerte Presse tat das ihrige, um die Schuld nicht etwa den Gas-Dieben der Ukraine anzulasten, sondern stets war die Rede von Russland. Sogar in Deutschland wurde von einer Unzuverlässigkeit Russlands geschrieben und gesprochen - und die Ukraine wurde dabei bon Schuldzuweisungen verschont. Es wird dies alles in den USA geplant - Präsidenten in den Satellitenstaaten der USA erhalten nur ihre Anweisungen.


Machtkampf in

Kiew:

Juschtschenkos

Amt will

Gasverträge mit

Moskau

revidieren - MEHR

15:56 | 22/ 01/ 2009

KIEW, 22. Januar (RIA Novosti). In der Ukraine dauert der Machtkampf zwischen Präsident Viktor Juschtschenko und Premierministerin Julia Timoschenko weiter an.

Am Donnerstag schlug der Vizechef des Präsidentenamtes, Andrej Kislinski, vor, die von Timoschenko abgeschlossenen Gasverträge mit Russland, mit denen diese Woche der Gaskonflikt beendet wurde, von den Justiz- und Sicherheitsbehörden überprüfen zu lassen.

Die Generalstaatsanwalt und der Sicherheitsdienst sollen die Umstände untersuchen, unter denen Timoschenko die Vereinbarungen mit Russland getroffen habe, forderte Kislinski. Dies sei notwendig, "um eine wirtschaftliche und politische Destabilisierung in der Ukraine nicht zuzulassen", zitiert ihn das Presseamt des Präsidenten.

"Timoschenko hat die Grenze überschritten, die die Suche nach Unterstützung im benachbarten Land vom totalen Verrat an den nationalen Interessen trennt", so Kislinski weiter. "Deshalb versucht die Regierungschefin krampfhaft die Öffentlichkeit vom Inhalt der Verhandlungen in Moskau und der abgeschlossenen Verträge abzulenken." Laut Kislinski hat Timoschenko in Moskau neben den Gasvereinbarungen geheime Protokolle signiert, die sie nie offenlegen werde.

Der schwelende Machtkampf zwischen den einstigen politischen Weggefährten der orange Revolution, Juschtschenko und Timoschenko, lähmt seit Jahren das Land. Während sich Timoschenko, die den neuen Gasvertrag mit Russland abschloss, als Siegerin im Gaskonflikt sieht, spricht Juschtschenko von einer Niederlage für die Ukraine.

Der Nationale Sicherheitsrat wird auf Anweisung des Präsidenten an diesem Freitag die Gasverträge mit Russland erörtern. Während der Gaskrise, die drei Wochen angedauert hatte, war der Sicherheitsrat kein einziges Mal zusammengetreten, während sich Juschtschenko in einem Skiort in den Karpaten erholte.

Wenn sich also ein Präsident nicht von seiner Bevölkerung verprügeln lassen will, WAS macht er dann ? Er zieht sich in sein Zipfel-Ukrainien zurück - dorthin wo man seinen Dialekt spricht, obwohl er sogar dort weitestgehend an Rückhalt verloren hat. Also eine Art des Kohl'schen Aussitzens, wenn etwas auf Befehl gegen die Bevölkerung entschieden werden muß.


Sitzung des ukrainischen

Sicherheitsrates

zu Gasproblemen

verschoben

(Zusammenfassung)


22:03 | 22/ 01/ 2009

KIEW, 22. Januar (RIA Novosti). Die für diesen Freitag geplante Sitzung des Rates für nationale Sicherheit und Verteidigung der Ukraine ist bis auf weiteres verschoben worden.

"Das Datum der Sitzung wird später bekannt gegeben", sagte die Leiterin der Hauptabteilung für Informationspolitik im Sekretariat des Präsidenten, Larissa Mudrak, am Donnerstag in Kiew. Zuvor hatte Staatschef Viktor Juschtschenko die Sitzung zum 23. Januar einberufen. Auf der Tagesordnung standen die zwischen dem russischen Gasmonopolisten Gazprom und dem ukrainischen Energieversorger Naftogaz unterzeichneten Gasverträge.

Beobachter in der Ukraine sind keiner einhelligen Meinung darüber, ob der Sicherheitsrat genug Vollmachten hat, um die Gasverträge mit Russland zu revidieren. Die ukrainische Regierungschefin Julia Timoschenko äußerte die Überzeugung, dass der Sicherheitsrat in dieser Frage machtlos sei.

Am 19. Januar hatten Gazprom-Chef Alexej Miller und Naftogaz-Chef Oleg Dubina in Moskau zwei Verträge unterzeichnet - über die Gasversorgung der Ukraine und über den Transit von russischem Gas nach Europa. Die im Beisein der Ministerpräsidenten beider Länder, Wladimir Putin und Julia Timoschenko zustande gebrachten Dokumente haben eine Laufzeit von zehn Jahren. Nach Timoschenkos Worten werden die erzielten Gasvereinbarungen es gestatten, Probleme in der Gassphäre künftig zu vermeiden.

In Anbetracht der Medien-Unterstützung, die die Ukraine während des Gas-Streits, den sie selbst vom Zaum gebrochen hatte, konnte sich Juschtschenko auf seine Chefs in Washington verlassen und beruhigt der Dinge harren, die da kommen.


Juschtschenkos Team sieht Ruf

der Ukraine durch Gas-Streit

als unbeschadet an

17:45 | 23/ 01/ 2009

KIEW, 23. Januar (RIA Novosti). Der Beauftragte des ukrainischen Präsidenten für Energiesicherheit, Bogdan Sokolowski, sieht den Ruf der Ukraine durch die Gas-Krise nicht beeinträchtigt und verspricht die Einhaltung aller neuen Vertragskonditionen.

„Der Ruf der Ukraine im Westen wurde von diesem Gasproblem nicht beeinträchtigt“, sagte Sokolowski am Freitagnachmittag bei einem Runden Tisch im Kiewer Büro von RIA Novosti.

Sokolowski sagte, er habe in den vergangenen Tagen viele europäische Länder besucht, die russisches Erdgas beziehen würden: „Sowohl auf Regierungs- als auch auf Expertenebene waren sich alle darüber im Klaren, dass das Problem nicht die Ukraine ist“. Die Krise sei weder auf den Zustand des ukrainischen Pipeline-Netzes noch auf innenpolitische Probleme der Ukraine zurückzuführen.

Die ukrainische Innenpolitik hänge mit der wirtschaftlichen Kooperation mit Russland überhaupt nicht zusammen: „Sie kennen die Position von Präsident Viktor Juschtschenko: Je weniger Politik in der Energiekooperation, desto besser für die Menschen. Jeder Mensch hat das Recht auf Energie-Zugriff. Das ist eine gottgegebene Substanz“.

Zuvor hatte Juschtschenkos Umfeld den Vertrag, laut dem die Ukraine im ersten Quartal des laufenden Jahres 360 US-Dollar für 1000 Kubikmeter russisches Gas zahlen muss, scharf kritisiert. Alexander Schlapak, Vizechef des Präsidialamtes, sagte etwa, Regierungschefin Julia Timoschenko habe die Vertragskonditionen nicht vorher mit dem Präsidenten abgestimmt. Im Ergebnis sei der Gaspreis für die Ukraine zu hoch.

Dabei geht die Regierung unter der US-Marionette Juschtschenko davon aus, daß die West-Medien die Berichterstattung zur Propaganda gegen Russland nutzen und vom eigentlichen Initiator des Gas-Streits ablenken. Unumstößlicher Fakt ist, daß die Ukraine die Transit-Gaspipeline abgedreht hatte - und die Propaganda-Medien im Westen sofort gegen Russland Stellung bezogen. Die Ukraine hatte ihre Rechnungen nicht bezahlt, ihr wurde daraufhin das Gas FÜR die Ukraine abgestellt - und die Ukraine entnahm einfach das Gas, das für den Westen bestimmt war - rechtlich: Diebstahl genannt, während sie mit den Westmedien Russland die Schuld gab.


US-Botschafter

schließt Krieg

zwischen Ukraine

und Russland aus

21:44 | 22/ 01/ 2009

KIEW, 22. Januar (RIA Novosti). Trotz der politischen Spannungen zwischen Russland und der Ukraine schließt der US-Botschafter in Kiew, William Taylor, einen militärischen Konflikt zwischen diesen Staaten völlig aus.

"Ich glaube nicht, dass es zu einem Krieg zwischen der Ukraine und Russland kommen kann", sagte der Diplomat am Donnerstag in Simferopol nach Angaben der Nachrichtenagentur Unian. Russland und die Ukraine seien "verantwortungsbewusste Staaten", ihre Regierungen würden die Kontroversen friedlich beilegen können.

Selbst als der Gaskonflikt auf dem Höhepunkt gewesen sei, habe es keine einzige

Andeutung auf einen bewaffneten Konflikt gegeben.



Übersetzung nachstehend

Ющенко дал добро на газовые

соглашения с Россией

15:50 «Вести.Ru»

Президент Украины Виктор Ющенко ни в коем случае не настроен на пересмотр газовых соглашений, напротив, он настаивает на их выполнении. Об этом заявил

в пятницу полпред президента Украины по вопросам энергетической безопасности Богдан Соколовский.

«Позиция президента Украины Виктора Ющенко по контрактам следующая: есть то, что есть. Что подписано, то нужно выполнять. И Украина будет это выполнять», — сказал Богдан Соколовский на круглом столе в Киеве, передает РИА Новости.

В то же время, по словам представителя президента, подписанные соглашения создадут проблемы для Украины, поэтому сейчас необходимо думать над тем, как с этими проблемами справляться.

Также в пятницу первый вице-премьер Украины Александр Турчинов заявил, что правительство Юлии Тимошенко не допустит «ревизии контрактов между “Нафтогазом” и “Газпромом”, которые отвечают экономическим интересам Украины».

Übersetzung Politik-Global - Rumpelstilz:

Präsident Juschtschenko gab

seine Zustimmung zum

Gas-Vertrag mit Russland

Der Präsident der Ukraine Viktor Juschtschenko ist in keinem Fall in der Stimmung das Gas-Abkommen zu revidieren, im Gegenteil, er besteht auf seine Erfüllung. Dies teilte am Freitag der Bevollmächtigte des Präsidenten für Fragen der Energiesicherheit Bogdan Sokolovski mit.

"Die Position des Präsidenten der Ukraine Viktoor Juschtschenko auf den Vertrag ist die Folgende: was ist, das ist. Was unterzeichnet wurde, das muß eingehalten werden. Und die Ukraine wird dies erfüllen", sagte Bogdan Sokolovski am Runden Tisch in Kiew, teilt RIA Novosti mit.

Gleichzeitig, gemäß den Worten des Vertreters des Präsidenten, schafft das Abkommen Probleme für die Ukraine, denn jetzt ist es notwendig daran zu denken, mit diesen Problemen fertig zu werden.

Ebenfalls am Freitag bestätigte der Vize-Premier der Ukraine Alexander Turchinow, daß die Regierung Juliya Timoschenko "eine revision des Vertrages zwischen Naftogas und Gazprom nicht zuläßt, der den wirtschaftlichen Interessen der Ukraine entspricht.

«Газпром» в 2009 году заплатит

«Нафтогазу» за транзит $2,3 млрд

14:21 РИА «Новости»

КИЕВ, 23 янв — РИА Новости. «Газпром» в 2009 году заплатит «Нафтогаз Украины» за транзит газа порядка 2,3 миллиардов долларов, сообщил заместитель председателя правления «Газпрома» Валерий Голубев.

«Порядка 2,3 миллиардов долларов, это то, что “Газпром” заплатит за функционирование газотранспортной системы», — сказал Голубев в пятницу в Киеве в ходе внеочередного заседания украинско-российского форума «Кризис в украинско-российских торгово-экономических отношениях: пути преодоления». Его слова приводит украинское информационное агентство УНИАН.

При этом представитель руководства российского газового концерна отметил, что в дальнейшем тариф на транзит газа будет расти.

Газовые договоренности между «Нафтогаз Украины» и «Газпромом» были подписаны 19 января в Москве. В частности, был подписан договор купли-продажи газа на 2009-2019 годы. Украина получила скидку в 20% от

среднеевропейской цены на газ, которая в первом квартале 2009 года составляет 450 долларов за тысячу кубометров. Украинская сторона, в свою очередь, сохраняет ставку транзита в 2009 году на уровне 2008 года — 1,7 долларов за тысячу кубометров на 100 километров.

Übersetzung Politik-Global:

Gazprom bezahlt 2009 an Naftogaz

2,3 Milliarden Dollar für den Transit

Kiew, 23. Jan. - RIA Novosti. Im Jahr 2009 bezahlt Gazprom an Naftogaz der Ukraine für den Transit des Gases in der Größenordnung von 2,3 Milliarden Dollar, teilte der Vertreter des Vorsitzenden des Aufsichtsrates von Gazprom, Valeri Golubev mit.

"Die Größenordnung von 2,3 Milliarden Dollar ist das, was Gazprom für das

Funktionieren der Gastransportsysteme bezahlt", sagte Golubev am Freitag in Kiew im Verlauf der außerordentlichen Sitzung des ukrainisch-russischen Forums "Krise in der ukrainisch-russischen Handels- und Wirtschaftsbeziehungen: Wege der Überwindung". Diese Worte wurden von der ukrainischen Nachrichtenagentur UNIAN übermittelt.

Dabei bemerkte der Vertreter der Leitung des russischen Gaskonzerns, daß weiterhin der Tarif für den Gastransit ansteigen wird.

Das Gasabkommen zwischen Naftogaz der Ukraine und Gazprom wurde am 19. Januar in Moskau unterzeichnet. Insbesondere wurde der Kauf- und Verkaufs-Vertrag für 2009 bis 2019 unterzeichnet. die Ukraine hat einen rabatt von 20% auf den mitteleuropäischen Gaspreis erhalten, der sich im ersten Quartal 2009 auf 450 Dollar/1000 cbm beläuft. Auf der ukrainischen Seite wird ihrerseits die Transitlieferung in 2009 auf dem Niveau von 2008 gehalten für 1,7 Dollar je 1000 cbm je 100 km.


Kommentar Politik-Global:

Es scheint, daß der Premier-Ministerin "das Hemd näher ist, als die Jacke", oder daß die 2,3 Milliarden Dollar lieber sind, als den Staatsbankrott erklären zu müssen - denn die Ukraine steht kurz vor dem Bankrott. Die Arbeitslosenzahl unter den als 'arbeitsfähig' gezählten Ukrainern, die sich im Land befinden (viele sind nach Russland oder in EU-Länder getürmt, da es in der Ukraine so gut wie keine Arbeit gibt) sich in den letzten Wochen verdoppelt hat. Dafür hat sich aber auch die Staatsverschuldung verdoppelt.

Bis zum 19. Januar hatte die Ukraine ja noch brav die Anweisungen aus den USA befolgt und die Gasversorgung der EU aus Russland blockiert - eben in Anbetracht der am 19. Dezember mit den USA unterzeichneten Charta, der zufolge die USA schrittweise die Gaspipeline der Ukraine übernehmen wollte. Ziel der Übernahme der Gas-Transitpipeline durch US-Investoren war die Möglichkeit, Russland von Einnahmen aus dem Gasgeschäft mit Europa abzuschneiden.

Es läuft also WIEDER das GLEICHE Szenario ab, wie schon zu Zeiten Gorbatschows, als die USA durch verabredete Preissenkungen für Rohöl mit den Golfstaaten die Sowjetunion ihrer Einnahmen aus dem Ölgeschäft beraubte - was letztendlich zum Zusammenbruch der UdSSR geführt hatte. Nur ist dieses Mal nicht das Freimaurer-Logenmitglied Gorbatschow Staatschef, sondern der Patriot Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin als Premier-Minister, dem die Entwicklung Russlands NICHT egal ist.

Alles weist darauf hin, daß die USA (mit England und Israel im Hintergrund) noch immer die vollständige Zerstörung Russlands planen, d.h. die Zerstückelung der Russischen Föderation in 5 bis 7 kleine Einzelstaaten, die von der City of London nach Belieben vernichtet, geplündert und zerstört werden können. Hier sei nur nochmals an die Aussage der Ausßenministerin unter Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright, aus dem Jahr 1999 erinnert, die aussprach, daß das Ziel ist, die russische Bevölkerung auf 15 Millionen Menschen zu reduzieren (= 10%) und die deutsche Bevölkerung auf 8 Millionen. Madeleine Albright (Mädchenname Kober, 1937 zum Katholizismus konvertierte Jüdin aus der damaligen Tschechoslowakei) erhält noch immer Einflußpositionen zugeschachert - und zählt heute mit zum Beraterstab von Barack Ohhh Bama.

Wer heute noch im von den USA besetzten Gebiet der "BRD" an eine "Freundschaft" mit den USA glaubt, sollte sich schleunigst psychiatrisch behandeln lassen.


(c) 2009 Copyright Politik-Global Rumpelstilz 2009-01-23

.