0806-16 / Irish News - Vote NO

.

Also der Irische Blätterwald scheint wohl sehr auf wenige Herausgeber konzentriert zu sein, die gleichen Nachrichten, die gleiche Aufmachung - aber Ausnahmen gibt es Gott sei Dank unter den Hunderten.

Und das ging an Mitteilung:


JUNE 12th will be the deciding day for ALL 400 million people in Europe

And everything depends on YOU – since Irish people are the only one to have the right to vote in a referendum.


P L E A S E . V O T E . N O . F O R . A L L . O F . U S


Please take note about the scandal-quotation from the ex-EU-chairman Jean-Claude Juncker about EU-politics:

"We decide on something, and then we put it out and wait a while to see if anything happens. And then, if there isn't any big outcry or revolt, because most people don't understand what's been decided, we keep on going, step by step, until there's no turning back"(Jean-Claude Juncker explains the democracy to his EU colleagues. MIRROR 52/1999, page 136)

In the past, we already had the same procedure, Germany ratified the "Constitution" – but it aborted, it was illegal – AGAINST THE LAW. And the Lisbon-Treaty is almost the same contract, nearly nothing had been changed, just a little bit better hidden. Already for the first Constitution and, on behalf of Dr. Peter Gauweiler, Prof. Schachtschneider petitioned the Federal Constitutional Court.

INTERVIEW:

PROF. KARL ALBRECHT SCHACHTSCHNEIDER Europe Should Establish Itself As a Republic of the Republics Not As a Super-StateOn behalf of Dr. Peter Gauweiler, Prof. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider has filed suit against the Constitutional Treaty. He is Professor of Public Law at Erlangen-Nuernberg University, and is a well-known specialist in European law and the European Union's (EU's) proposed Constitutional Treaty. In 1992, it was he who petitioned the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, in an attempt to prevent Germany from ratifying the Maastricht Treaty. In 1998, alongside Professors Wilhelm Hankel, Wilhelm Noelling, and Joachim Starbatty, he again entered a petition in the Federal Constitutional Court to prevent Germany from adopting the euro.

Question: Professor Schachtschneider, you have just entered a petition before the Federal Constitutional Court, in an attempt to prevent Germany from ratifying the Constitutional Treaty.[4] What are the critical constitutional issues involved?

Schachtschneider: My essential motive in all of this, is that I must stand up for the law, when it comes to European integration. I accept the principle of integration as that appears in the German Constitution, but the law must not get lost in the process. This political point of view is one to which the Federal Constitutional Court has lent an ear in the past, as we saw during the debate over the Maastricht Treaty.There is no such thing as freedom without law, but neither is there law without a state. The law, and consequently freedom, and, most especially, the rights of man, are now gravely jeopardized, on account of this flight forward to European integration indeed, many rights have already vanished. I intend to save what can yet be saved. I view that as a duty. There must be someone in Germany to force through a debate on the issue, and the Federal Constitutional Court happens to be the sole institution in a position to do so. There is no one else prepared to seriously debate the European Constitutional Treaty with the happy exception of yourselves. But the mass media will not touch it, nor will the two chambers of Parliament, despite Dr. Peter Gauweiler's (MoP) efforts.

During the Maastricht debate in 1992, I did succeed, despite all obstacles, in launching a serious debate. Of course, debating it will not suffice; the treaty needs to be changed, because it is wrong, and it will unleash enormous harm.

Among the principles that I stand for, freedom in the broadest sense, there is to be found property, as well as the principles that underpin freedom: democracy, the constitutional state (Rechtsstaat), a state that promotes the common good (Sozialstaat), and federalism. Those principles, laid down by Article 20 of the German Constitution, have tended to recede into the background, as the process of European integration marches on. The new Constitutional Treaty is a milestone in the emergence of what I call the Unrechtsstaat, the unjust or unconstitutional state.Nor is this Treaty meant to be the final word! There will be further developments, included potentialities, that are frightening, such as the return of the death penalty. Not in all instances, but in case of war, or where the danger of war is imminent. Furthermore, it will be lawful to kill, should that be deemed needful to repress riot and insurrection. In other words, under the EU Charter of Human Rights, it would have been deemed legitimate to fire on the crowd at Leipzig in 1989!(.....)

And now once again, on behalf of Member of Parliament Dr. Peter Gauweiler, Prof. Dr. iur. K.A. Schachtschneider petitioned at the Federal Constitutional Court on May 27th,
Because the way how the European Community will become, it will be a Tyranny. It will be the end of democracy, the end of freedom and the end for a normal life for normal citizens.


You will find an expertise about the judicially well founded petition by Pr. Dr. Murswiek, University Freiburg
http://www.peter-gauweiler.de/pdf/Vertr%20Lissabon%20Gutachten.pdf

You will find the whole petition by Prof. Dr. iur. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider, University Erlangen
http://www.kaschachtschneider.de/Schriften/Dokumente-herunterladen/Schachtschn-Lissab-Klage.pdf


– where especially the pages (199 – 251 according to the pictograms of the pdf-file 0f a total of about 349 pages) are of interest, since the Lisbon-Treaty clearly allows KILLING of opponents.

You may also take note of our efforts for freedom and legality at:
http://politikglobal.blogspot.com/2008/06/0806-13-der-eu-vertrag-von-lissabon.html


We wish you all necessary success in the VOTE NO campaign – and that the real results will also be published – and not as the Bush elections in Florida and 4 years later in Oklahoma.

Personally all my best wishes – and all the best wishes of nearly all readers of Politik-Global, now some more than 40 000 /month.

Sorry for the pseudonym out of a non-free country (Germany) where Members of Parliament vote against the will of the population. But Europe by far would even be worse.

Rumpelstilz

Link Schachtschneider korrigiert / corrected the link to Schachtschneider - the actual petition against the Lisbon-Treaty June 10th, 21.13 GMT